Match forecast and score distribution for Match 34, Group E, generated from the current simulator ratings.
Group EKansas City, USA
Forecast last updated:
Average scoreEcuador 2.19 - 0.58 Curaçao Total goals average 2.78 Ecuador win74.4%Draw17.4%Curaçao win8.3%
Goal bands
Total goals distribution
06.3%
117.0%
224.0%
322.8%
415.2%
5+14.7%
Goal thresholds
Total-goal thresholds
Total 0.5At least 93.7%Below 6.3%
Total 1.5At least 76.7%Below 23.3%
Total 2.5At least 52.7%Below 47.3%
Total 3.5At least 29.9%Below 70.1%
Total 4.5At least 14.7%Below 85.3%
Team goals
Ecuador goal thresholds
Ecuador 0.5At least 89.1%Below 10.9%
Ecuador 1.5At least 64.3%Below 35.7%
Ecuador 2.5At least 37.4%Below 62.6%
Ecuador 3.5At least 17.8%Below 82.2%
Ecuador 4.5At least 7.0%Below 93.0%
Team goals
Curaçao goal thresholds
Curaçao 0.5At least 44.2%Below 55.8%
Curaçao 1.5At least 11.6%Below 88.5%
Curaçao 2.5At least 2.3%Below 97.8%
Curaçao 3.5At least 0.3%Below 99.7%
Curaçao 4.5At least 0.1%Below 100.0%
Scoring frequency
Both teams scoring
Both teams score39.6%
Ecuador clean sheet55.8%
Curaçao clean sheet10.9%
Common scorelines
Top exact scores
1Ecuador 2-0 Curaçao14.8%
2Ecuador 1-0 Curaçao13.7%
3Ecuador 3-0 Curaçao11.2%
4Ecuador 2-1 Curaçao9.0%
5Ecuador 1-1 Curaçao8.2%
6Ecuador 3-1 Curaçao6.3%
7Ecuador 0-0 Curaçao6.3%
8Ecuador 4-0 Curaçao5.9%
9Ecuador 4-1 Curaçao3.6%
10Ecuador 0-1 Curaçao3.3%
Guide
What this simulation preview shows
This page is a direct match simulation reference for one fixture. It uses the simulator's current team ratings and venue context to estimate score patterns, not a full tournament-path run.
Score distribution
How to read the numbers
Average score is the mean goals per team across all runs. Total-goal bands group matches by combined goals, both-team scoring frequency shows how often each side scores at least once, and common scorelines show the most frequent exact results in the sample.
Model note
Simulation reference, not certainty
A real match can land far away from the most common model outcomes. Use these outputs as a way to understand the range of plausible scorelines, not as a guarantee or betting advice.
Model note: These are simulation outputs for understanding possible score patterns. They are not betting advice or gambling guidance.